The claim will be judged TRUE if, prior to the judgement date, a candidate for president is accurately quoted in widely distributed print or electronic media during the campaign as saying that he/she is not a practicing Christian, AND that candidate is elected as president. If by the judgement date no elected candidate has made this statement, or the question has not been asked, the claim will be judged FALSE.
I will judge based on the intent of this claim, if I perceive such intent to be obvious. If such intent is ambiguous I will judge on the basis of the precise wording. If both are ambiguous, I will look for a solution which follows IF/FX precedent insofar as such precedent is apparent to me and applicable to the claim. I will seek the guidance of the claim's owner/author in interpreting the claim. It's his or her question - s/he ought to get the answer sought. If I believe this claim to have met a YES or NO condition, and if I believe judgement will be controversial, I will post a prospective judgement to fx-discuss and forestall entering the judgement for a comment period to be announced in the post.
